<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tamas Dragon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tamasdragon.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tamasdragon.com</link>
	<description>Pro Tools, Sound design, Tutorials, Tips &#38;Tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 20:01:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The big switch to Lion part 2 by Slimatrex review</title>
		<link>http://tamasdragon.com/2012/01/04/the-big-switch-to-lion-part-2/#comment-7748</link>
		<dc:creator>Slimatrex review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 20:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamasdragon.com/?p=254#comment-7748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good day! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout 
out and say I genuinely enjoy reading your blog posts.
Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that cover the same topics?
Thanks a ton!

http://cli.gs/www.chirpy.info]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good day! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout<br />
out and say I genuinely enjoy reading your blog posts.<br />
Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that cover the same topics?<br />
Thanks a ton!</p>
<p><a href="http://cli.gs/www.chirpy.info" rel="nofollow">http://cli.gs/www.chirpy.info</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Templates part 1 by Templates part 2 &#124; Tamas Dragon</title>
		<link>http://tamasdragon.com/2013/05/28/templates-part-1/#comment-7408</link>
		<dc:creator>Templates part 2 &#124; Tamas Dragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamasdragon.com/?p=1096#comment-7408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] time I wrote about the necessary brain work behind creating a really helpful template, now I would like to share the simple method of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time I wrote about the necessary brain work behind creating a really helpful template, now I would like to share the simple method of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some thoughts on the upcoming Pro Tools 11 by Tamas Dragon</title>
		<link>http://tamasdragon.com/2013/05/13/some-thoughts-on-the-upcoming-pro-tools-11/#comment-6771</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamas Dragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 08:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamasdragon.com/?p=1073#comment-6771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Mike,

because of the Pro Tools Expert posts I am very optimistic about PT11, can&#039;t wait to try it. Regarding the Mac minis, it&#039;s still an ongoing debate, frankly I couldn&#039;t decide it yet, but right now I like the mini approach better, but you are right, there can be many drawbacks in that solution. We&#039;ll see what Apple comes up with.

Tamas]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,</p>
<p>because of the Pro Tools Expert posts I am very optimistic about PT11, can&#8217;t wait to try it. Regarding the Mac minis, it&#8217;s still an ongoing debate, frankly I couldn&#8217;t decide it yet, but right now I like the mini approach better, but you are right, there can be many drawbacks in that solution. We&#8217;ll see what Apple comes up with.</p>
<p>Tamas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some thoughts on the upcoming Pro Tools 11 by Mike Thornton</title>
		<link>http://tamasdragon.com/2013/05/13/some-thoughts-on-the-upcoming-pro-tools-11/#comment-6436</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 09:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamasdragon.com/?p=1073#comment-6436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Tamas,

Thank you for a well measured and thought though post. I agree with you about the offline bounce, I too won&#039;t deliver a mix without listening all the way through. Bouncing to track saves my client&#039;s time as we can combine the audition and bounce passes, knowing that if something isn&#039;t perfect we can patch it without having to re-bounce the whole programme. Where I do see the offline bounce will help, is in outputting all the deliverables, once the mix is done.
As to evidence on speed, efficiency and power, we do have some. At Pro Tools Expert we have overseen a comparison with the same session on the same machine on PT10 and PT11 http://www.pro-tools-expert.com/home-page/2013/5/7/pro-tools-11-exponential-gains-claims-marketing-hype-or-real.html and also we have a quote from a developer about it http://www.pro-tools-expert.com/home-page/2013/5/8/support-for-the-pro-tools-11-exponential-claim.html
At NAB 2013, Avid were demoing a film session that with PT10 took 3 separate PT rigs to run, and it was all running in PT11 on one MacBook Pro. So all the evidence we have seen, all points to the benefits from the new Avid Audio Engine. As to computers I wrote a piece on the future of Apple&#039;s Mac Pro and where we should go as pro users http://www.pro-tools-expert.com/home-page/2013/5/11/the-future-of-apples-mac-pro.html and although I accept your &#039;good enough&#039; point, and for smaller independent users that is a key issue, I am concerned that we will end up with a significant number of add-on boxes to do all that we need.

Mike.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tamas,</p>
<p>Thank you for a well measured and thought though post. I agree with you about the offline bounce, I too won&#8217;t deliver a mix without listening all the way through. Bouncing to track saves my client&#8217;s time as we can combine the audition and bounce passes, knowing that if something isn&#8217;t perfect we can patch it without having to re-bounce the whole programme. Where I do see the offline bounce will help, is in outputting all the deliverables, once the mix is done.<br />
As to evidence on speed, efficiency and power, we do have some. At Pro Tools Expert we have overseen a comparison with the same session on the same machine on PT10 and PT11 <a href="http://www.pro-tools-expert.com/home-page/2013/5/7/pro-tools-11-exponential-gains-claims-marketing-hype-or-real.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pro-tools-expert.com/home-page/2013/5/7/pro-tools-11-exponential-gains-claims-marketing-hype-or-real.html</a> and also we have a quote from a developer about it <a href="http://www.pro-tools-expert.com/home-page/2013/5/8/support-for-the-pro-tools-11-exponential-claim.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pro-tools-expert.com/home-page/2013/5/8/support-for-the-pro-tools-11-exponential-claim.html</a><br />
At NAB 2013, Avid were demoing a film session that with PT10 took 3 separate PT rigs to run, and it was all running in PT11 on one MacBook Pro. So all the evidence we have seen, all points to the benefits from the new Avid Audio Engine. As to computers I wrote a piece on the future of Apple&#8217;s Mac Pro and where we should go as pro users <a href="http://www.pro-tools-expert.com/home-page/2013/5/11/the-future-of-apples-mac-pro.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pro-tools-expert.com/home-page/2013/5/11/the-future-of-apples-mac-pro.html</a> and although I accept your &#8216;good enough&#8217; point, and for smaller independent users that is a key issue, I am concerned that we will end up with a significant number of add-on boxes to do all that we need.</p>
<p>Mike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plug-in cleanup day by al-andrew</title>
		<link>http://tamasdragon.com/2013/04/30/plug-in-cleanup-day/#comment-6047</link>
		<dc:creator>al-andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 10:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamasdragon.com/?p=1061#comment-6047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love your blog !
Appreciate your workflow thinking, very clear...the way I like it.

What your take on the new PT 11 ?

You going to say good bye to all your RTAS goodies ?

Just curious,there are few of us here in South Africa in the pro circles who fee AVID have gone about this the wrong way and seriously thinking of dumping Pro Tools all together.

Its a never ending debate, but would love to hear your take :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love your blog !<br />
Appreciate your workflow thinking, very clear&#8230;the way I like it.</p>
<p>What your take on the new PT 11 ?</p>
<p>You going to say good bye to all your RTAS goodies ?</p>
<p>Just curious,there are few of us here in South Africa in the pro circles who fee AVID have gone about this the wrong way and seriously thinking of dumping Pro Tools all together.</p>
<p>Its a never ending debate, but would love to hear your take <img src='http://tamasdragon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
